Become the answer

AnswerFit by Anphase asks AI models what your product is, who it suits and whether they would recommend it. It shows where the answer is wrong and how to test a change. It is a measurement instrument, not an SEO suite, and it does not promise rankings.

Watch a run
ANNET / ILLUSTRATIVE RUN

An illustrative four-act run for Annet, an Anphase goal and accountability product at annet.ai. Ask: four models answer the same question about staying accountable to a big goal and none name Annet. Measure: Annet's report recorded on 3 Sept 2026 finds Annet named in 22 of 24 answers asked by name and 12 of 114 answers when customers ask; Habitica is recommended 40 times, Beeminder 38, Notion 36 and Annet 12. Change: category copy, SoftwareApplication JSON-LD and llms.txt are added, and the text that carries the argument is server-rendered. Re-test: Annet is named first by ChatGPT and Gemini, second by Claude and not named by Grok, for three of four sample answers, with an illustrative Fit Lift of +0.21, interval +0.12 to +0.30, and negative controls held. The baseline figures in Measure are recorded; the answers, the changes and the re-test are illustrative, not a measured lift.

04 / RE-TEST THE FIT

Same question, a different picture

asked again, same questions, same models
Named in 3 of 4
ChatGPTOpenAI model
What should I use to stay accountable to a big goal?
  1. 01AnnetGoals with an AI and your people
  2. 02HabiticaTurns goals into a game
  3. 03BeeminderMoney on the line
Annet: named
ClaudeAnthropic model
What should I use to stay accountable to a big goal?
  1. 01BeeminderCommitment with stakes
  2. 02AnnetAccountability with chosen people
  3. 03FocusmateWork alongside someone
Annet: named
GeminiGoogle model
What should I use to stay accountable to a big goal?
  1. 01AnnetAn accountability network
  2. 02NotionFlexible goal templates
  3. 03HabiticaGamified habits
Annet: named
GrokxAI model
What should I use to stay accountable to a big goal?
  1. 01BeeminderPay if you slip
  2. 02TodoistTasks and due dates
  3. 03HabiticaA goal RPG
Annet: not named
Fit Lift
interval +0.12 to +0.30 negative controls held
Explore the runILLUSTRATIVE / ANNET
Illustrative run based on Annet's recorded report. The baseline figures in Measure are recorded; the answers, the changes and the re-test are illustrative, not a measured lift.
02 / EXAMPLES

Examples

AF / 01
Missing from
25 of 25
customer questions
Named when asked directly: 39 of 39

Recommended instead

  • Insight Timer
  • Calm
  • Headspace

Top fix to try

Publish an llms.txt summary for models
Addresses 24 questions

Selfime's site publishes no llms.txt file.

Show history and next stepsHide details

What a model found, crawled 8 Oct 2026

  • no structured data
  • no llms.txt
  • 35% readable text

Changes so far

  • 29 Aug: 8% readable text, no structured data, no llms.txt
  • 8 Oct: readable text up to 35%; the other two gaps remain
  • Prepared, not live: llms.txt and structured data, waiting for review

Next to try

  • Add structured data that says what it is
  • Put the key text in the page itself

Re-test after the top fix

Named in 6 of 25 customer questionsIllustrative

Simulated to show what a re-test would report, and not a measured result.

AF / 02
Missing from
21 of 21
customer questions
Named when asked directly: 46 of 51

Recommended instead

  • Zotero
  • Readwise Reader
  • NotebookLM

Top fix to try

Add structured data that says what it is
Addresses 31 questions

No page on Poreover's site carries structured data saying what it is.

Show history and next stepsHide details

What a model found, crawled 8 Oct 2026

  • 3% readable text
  • no structured data

Changes so far

  • 29 Aug to 3 Sept: little readable text, nothing for models to read
  • 8 Oct: still one page at 3% readable text
  • Prepared, not live: llms.txt, structured data and a clearer first line

Next to try

  • Put the key text in the page itself
  • Link the name to its official profiles

Re-test after the top fix

Named in 4 of 21 customer questionsIllustrative

Simulated to show what a re-test would report, and not a measured result.

AF / 03
Missing from
20 of 20
customer questions
Named when asked directly: 6 of 12

Recommended instead

  • Strides
  • Todoist
  • Motion

Top fix to try

Link the name to its official profiles
Addresses 2 questions

Add schema.org sameAs on the entity's JSON-LD pointing at owned, unambiguous profiles.

Show history and next stepsHide details

What a model found, crawled 8 Oct 2026

  • 5% readable text
  • 2 pages empty without script
  • no llms.txt
  • structured data present

Changes so far

  • 22 Aug: 4% readable text and no structured data
  • 2 Sept: structured data added to the site
  • Prepared, not live: llms.txt and links to its official profiles

Next to try

  • Say in the first sentence what it is not
  • Pair the name with a unique qualifier

Re-test after the top fix

Named in 4 of 20 customer questionsIllustrative

Simulated to show what a re-test would report, and not a measured result.

AF / 04
Missing from
25 of 25
customer questions
Named when asked directly: 30 of 33

Recommended instead

  • 0x0.st
  • transfer.sh
  • webhook.site

Top fix to try

Add structured data that says what it is
Addresses 30 questions

No page on svc.nz's site carries structured data saying what it is.

Show history and next stepsHide details

What a model found, crawled 8 Oct 2026

  • no structured data
  • 38% readable text

Changes so far

  • 29 Aug: 20% readable text, no structured data
  • 8 Oct: readable text up to 38%; structured data still missing

Next to try

  • Put the key text in the page itself
  • Publish a page naming the specific capability and its mechanism

Re-test after the top fix

Named in 5 of 25 customer questionsIllustrative

Simulated to show what a re-test would report, and not a measured result.

From recorded runs on 9 Oct 2026: one model with web tools, three passes per product. Not a ranking.

Each run is versioned so every claim can be retested against a comparable run.

Does AI understand what you made?

Being known is not the same as being understood. AnswerFit keeps four readings apart, so a high number in one cannot hide a gap in another.

  1. Known by name

    When someone asks about you directly, does the model recognise you?

  2. Described correctly

    When it does, is what it says true, or is it describing something else?

  3. Suited to a use case

    When someone describes a problem you solve, are you named?

  4. Recommended

    When someone asks what to choose, are you among the answers?

Where the answer is wrong, the report names the one misunderstanding worth testing and proposes an experiment, and never promises a fix. Results that did not move, or moved the wrong way, are kept in the notebook beside the ones that did.

In private beta

AnswerFit is being pressure-tested across models, angles and positioning, with early access limited while that work continues.

* Required
Read our privacy policy.